SammyAdams

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:3,057 Points:793,605 Joined:Nov 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:00:12 PM
To: aquarinut Re: Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:52:59 PM (Printed below)
"Sierra Club is nothing but a marketing scam for those higher up the ladder in their own eco food chain.
Check out their eco "friendly" outings... absolutely no suggestions or help on how to get to them in an environmentally friendly way. But boy do you pay big time for the outing!!! Any media spouting is to secure more funds from current members and recruit new members into a corporate organization by hype and fear mongering!" ====================================================================
It's true. These extreme environmentalist groups use hype and fear mongering to recruit new members and advance their cause. And we are talking BILLION$ of dollars in assets.
|
aquarinut

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:1,628 Points:436,855 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:52:59 PM
Sierra Club is nothing but a marketing scam for those higher up the ladder in their own eco food chain.
Check out their eco "friendly" outings... absolutely no suggestions or help on how to get to them in an environmentally friendly way. But boy do you pay big time for the outing!!! Any media spouting is to secure more funds from current members and recruit new members into a corporate organization by hype and fear mongering!
|
orphancarguyPE

Champion Author
PEI
Posts:3,853 Points:735,965 Joined:Jan 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:44:17 PM
Its true as far as it goes, but what is conveniently overlooked by SC is that American tight oil found imbedded in tiny droplets in rock formations is just about as 'dirty' as tar sands is 'dirty'--it all depends how you define the word dirty.
Here is a different way---ERoEI (sometimes just called EROI) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested
Cheap conventional oil in the OLD days had an ERoEI of up to 100:1 one barrel used netted you 100 TO use. Now, everything is in the single digits to 1 and falling ie 5:1, 4:1, 3:1 and less. When it gets to 1.01:1, you have to burn 100 barrels to get 101. One extra barrel for all your trouble. Things will stop well before then.
New difficult, expensive oil requires a lot of energy in (especially in oil and natural gas USED in the process) to get anything out, be it tar sands, deep ocean far offshore, Alaska high arctic or tight oil. That is why it is difficult, and expensive and very very dirty. The bitumen can be cleaned up. The energy costs cannot.
This is nothing new. As it points out, that is why the Roman Empire fell--upside down in ERoEI. When forests have been clearcut, times were bleak until coal was found and exploited. Most of the coal that is left is falling sharply worldwide in ERoEI, especially since the "EI" has to include the cleanup costs. Oil replaced coal for a century or so, but it too is failing.
Note the interesting about wind. It might not be 'dense' very adaptable energy like coal or oil, but it has a great ERoEI of 20:1 (still not very adaptable--like you can't fly planes on electricity etc-- but it is a good bang for the buck in other words)
But getting back to the Sierra Club...if not dirty tar sands and dirty shale oil, where is there enough clean oil to make the transition OFF oil? You can't avoid that question, either the transition OR the time factor.
The biggest thing that (realisticly) we have to be "extremely worried" about is the "Energy Trap" as in: http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/the-energy-trap/
Unfortunately, only a small percentage of people will 'get it' before its too late.
[Edited by: orphancarguyPE at 4/30/2012 8:46:56 PM EST]
|
drpepperTX

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:8,950 Points:753,185 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 6:28:48 PM
Teafertwo, the info from the article is Sierra Club bull feces.
|
teafortwo

Champion Author
Washington
Posts:22,117 Points:1,386,065 Joined:Feb 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 3:07:04 PM
FROM THE ARTICLE:
Bitumen is a heavy, tar-like oil. It needs to be heavily processed in order to be turned into lighter, easier to refine, crude oil. Because bitumen is so thick, to make it more fluid and easier to move by pipeline, it gets diluted with natural gas liquids.
Besides the sheer amount of energy and water needed to process and extract bitumen, environmentalists say it's more dangerous to move because it's more corrosive to pipelines than regular crude.
While the industry maintains bitumen is safe, the danger of transporting it is one of the reasons there is so much opposition to the Keystone pipeline expansion, which is supposed to carry it, among other oil products.
|
des7902

Veteran Author
Virginia
Posts:385 Points:212,240 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 11:07:24 AM
Don't believe the tree huggers on this one.
|
rjojo40

Champion Author
Las Vegas
Posts:7,384 Points:1,076,615 Joined:Feb 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 11:04:27 AM
Focus on Natural gas. We have plenty of it. Lets make Natural Gas the norm.
|
VomVom

Champion Author
Calgary
Posts:3,857 Points:1,627,080 Joined:May 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:29:23 AM
drpepper is right. The Canadian dilbit is no different than the dilbit imported from Veneuzla and the dilbit produced from the oil sands of East Utah. The Sierra Club continues to use false information and fearmongering tactics to advance its cause.
[Edited by: VomVom at 4/30/2012 11:29:53 AM EST]
|
miser709

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:1,268 Points:1,070,800 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:23:22 AM
"Because bitumen is so thick, to make it more fluid and easier to move by pipeline, it gets diluted with natural gas liquids".
Just use natural gas ONLY and remove our dependence on foreign oil. We are the Saudi Arabia of natural gas, we need to use our own resources and keep the money in the USA.
I would buy a natural gas vehicle.
|
drpepperTX

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:8,950 Points:753,185 Joined:Apr 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:14:16 AM
What a load of bull feces Sierra Club keeps pushing out.
They have said the oil in the pipeline is heated. WRONG. In a line like Keystone oil comes in at temps between 80-120°F. The oil stays within that temperature range during transport. The changes in temperature are the result of friction, the length of pipeline, the season and weather conditions.
The Canadian oil is very similar to oil that is already being transported and processed by other pipelines and refineries across the United States and have been for decades.
Really, it looks more and more like the opposition to the Keystone XL is more about the fear that the pipeline could actually push overall gasoline prices DOWN in the U.S.
|
Nancy&Len

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:2,058 Points:1,946,790 Joined:Sep 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:16:15 AM
Okay
|
Eugene_C

Champion Author
Columbus
Posts:2,299 Points:155,995 Joined:Mar 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:08:51 AM
That's because most of the "clean oil" is gone and most of what is left is "dirty" oil.
|
fracknsave

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:1,666 Points:58,000 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:06:23 AM
Living with your only focus on utopia does cloud reality.
|
A2J

Champion Author
Richmond
Posts:3,080 Points:603,925 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:06:10 AM
triple ???
|
TXRanger09

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:2,511 Points:892,150 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:03:41 AM
And the Canadians haven't built a refinery near the tar sands why?!
|
nj2000ng

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,507 Points:449,020 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:58 AM
whatever.
|
Buckeyee

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:4,611 Points:900,600 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:28 AM
Yes Sierra Club, ban all oil, then we can start to cut the trees in the national forest to heat our homes in winter. Another good idea, Oh Ban those wind mills too, they hurt birds too.
|
ziyulu

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:8,504 Points:1,603,850 Joined:Aug 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:15 AM
Define "dirty". Dirty in that it causes pollution? Or dirty in that it is handled by unethical people?
|
Goatroper

Champion Author
Dallas
Posts:6,604 Points:1,295,435 Joined:Apr 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:54:36 AM
A little here and a little there and it adds up.
|
manbig13

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:1,431 Points:556,725 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:53:41 AM
where is my hydrogen
|
BurntOrange

Champion Author
Austin
Posts:8,733 Points:1,583,990 Joined:Nov 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:44:32 AM
I like it dirty.
|
Joeski1

Champion Author
New Jersey
Posts:10,007 Points:1,742,810 Joined:Dec 2004
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:23:02 AM
Is there clean oil?
Or is there dirty oil and dirtier oil?
|
johntxx

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,784 Points:617,070 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:22:19 AM
Well, the environmentalist has got the same last name. Related to Karl?
Sorry but I have to go with the common sense from the article: "More importantly, the industry says the pipeline companies would not agree to carry this stuff if it really was destroying their systems.
"No pipeline operator would want to spend billions of dollars to transport something their pipeline can't handle," said Andy Black, president of the U.S.-based Association of Oil Pipe Lines."
|
lcleveland

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:2,666 Points:652,025 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:20:12 AM
ok
|
grandmacbc

Champion Author
Buffalo
Posts:6,540 Points:1,430,775 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:18:54 AM
I say these environmentalists should come up with affordable alternatives instead of just putting out their propaganda.
|
wildddkattt80

Champion Author
Phoenix
Posts:2,143 Points:432,145 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:16:08 AM
Anything to get us away from middle east oil
|
uatide13

Rookie Author
Alabama
Posts:23 Points:13,490 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:15:04 AM
Good
|
jpgilmor

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:2,170 Points:604,925 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:15:03 AM
and yet environmentalists still drive……
|
dgerst

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:2,715 Points:557,000 Joined:Aug 2008
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:09:45 AM
So would you want to live near a refinery that is refining this dirty oil?
|
Evilmaddog

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:3,327 Points:958,525 Joined:Aug 2010
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:09:43 AM
People still love throwing money to those crazy Arabs
|
itzagasgasgas1

Champion Author
Cincinnati
Posts:3,979 Points:1,600,470 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:08:30 AM
This is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about. Commonly referred to as oil sands but more accurately described as tar sands. And what happens to the byproducts of refining? Where does the nasty stuff go?
|
carpenter4u

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:2,436 Points:617,145 Joined:Jul 2011
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:07:41 AM
if the oil company can notmake a profit refining "dirty oil", there would be no market for it
|
alex395

Champion Author
Louisville
Posts:2,050 Points:276,710 Joined:Jan 2007
|
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:07:22 AM
Don't believe anything the Sierra Club has to say. Agenda will not allow objective analysis.
|