Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    6:53 PM

GasBuddy News Article

30
votes
U.S. 'dirty oil' imports set to triple

CNN -- U.S. imports of what environmentalists are calling "dirty oil" are set to triple over the next decade, raising concerns over the environmental impact of extracting it and whether pipelines can safely transport this Canadian oil.

The United States currently imports over half a million barrels a day of bitumen from Canada's oil sands region, according to the Sierra Club. That number, Sierra Club says is set to grow to over 1.5 million barrels by 2020. That represents nearly 10% of the country's current consumption.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration's overall Canadian oil production numbers are in-line with the Sierra Club's projected pace.

Bitumen is a heavy, tar-like oil. It needs to be heavily processed in order to be turned into more viscous, easier to refine, crude oi


Read the Full Article

Submitted Apr 30, 2012 By: stpetebp
Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: U.S. 'dirty oil' imports set to triple Post a Reply Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
SammyAdams
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:3,057
Points:793,605
Joined:Nov 2010
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:00:12 PM

To: aquarinut Re: Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:52:59 PM (Printed below)

"Sierra Club is nothing but a marketing scam for those higher up the ladder in their own eco food chain.

Check out their eco "friendly" outings... absolutely no suggestions or help on how to get to them in an environmentally friendly way. But boy do you pay big time for the outing!!! Any media spouting is to secure more funds from current members and recruit new members into a corporate organization by hype and fear mongering!"
====================================================================

It's true. These extreme environmentalist groups use hype and fear mongering to recruit new members and advance their cause. And we are talking BILLION$ of dollars in assets.
Profile Pic
aquarinut
Champion Author British Columbia

Posts:1,628
Points:436,855
Joined:Jul 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:52:59 PM

Sierra Club is nothing but a marketing scam for those higher up the ladder in their own eco food chain.

Check out their eco "friendly" outings... absolutely no suggestions or help on how to get to them in an environmentally friendly way. But boy do you pay big time for the outing!!! Any media spouting is to secure more funds from current members and recruit new members into a corporate organization by hype and fear mongering!
Profile Pic
orphancarguyPE
Champion Author PEI

Posts:3,853
Points:735,965
Joined:Jan 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:44:17 PM

Its true as far as it goes, but what is conveniently overlooked by SC is that American tight oil found imbedded in tiny droplets in rock formations is just about as 'dirty' as tar sands is 'dirty'--it all depends how you define the word dirty.

Here is a different way---ERoEI (sometimes just called EROI)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_returned_on_energy_invested

Cheap conventional oil in the OLD days had an ERoEI of up to 100:1 one barrel used netted you 100 TO use. Now, everything is in the single digits to 1 and falling ie 5:1, 4:1, 3:1 and less. When it gets to 1.01:1, you have to burn 100 barrels to get 101. One extra barrel for all your trouble. Things will stop well before then.

New difficult, expensive oil requires a lot of energy in (especially in oil and natural gas USED in the process) to get anything out, be it tar sands, deep ocean far offshore, Alaska high arctic or tight oil. That is why it is difficult, and expensive and very very dirty. The bitumen can be cleaned up. The energy costs cannot.

This is nothing new. As it points out, that is why the Roman Empire fell--upside down in ERoEI. When forests have been clearcut, times were bleak until coal was found and exploited. Most of the coal that is left is falling sharply worldwide in ERoEI, especially since the "EI" has to include the cleanup costs. Oil replaced coal for a century or so, but it too is failing.

Note the interesting about wind. It might not be 'dense' very adaptable energy like coal or oil, but it has a great ERoEI of 20:1 (still not very adaptable--like you can't fly planes on electricity etc-- but it is a good bang for the buck in other words)

But getting back to the Sierra Club...if not dirty tar sands and dirty shale oil, where is there enough clean oil to make the transition OFF oil? You can't avoid that question, either the transition OR the time factor.

The biggest thing that (realisticly) we have to be "extremely worried" about is the "Energy Trap" as in:
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the-math/2011/10/the-energy-trap/

Unfortunately, only a small percentage of people will 'get it' before its too late.

[Edited by: orphancarguyPE at 4/30/2012 8:46:56 PM EST]
Profile Pic
drpepperTX
Champion Author Texas

Posts:8,950
Points:753,185
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 6:28:48 PM

Teafertwo, the info from the article is Sierra Club bull feces.
Profile Pic
teafortwo
Champion Author Washington

Posts:22,117
Points:1,386,065
Joined:Feb 2009
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 3:07:04 PM

FROM THE ARTICLE:

Bitumen is a heavy, tar-like oil. It needs to be heavily processed in order to be turned into lighter, easier to refine, crude oil. Because bitumen is so thick, to make it more fluid and easier to move by pipeline, it gets diluted with natural gas liquids.

Besides the sheer amount of energy and water needed to process and extract bitumen, environmentalists say it's more dangerous to move because it's more corrosive to pipelines than regular crude.

While the industry maintains bitumen is safe, the danger of transporting it is one of the reasons there is so much opposition to the Keystone pipeline expansion, which is supposed to carry it, among other oil products.

Profile Pic
des7902
Veteran Author Virginia

Posts:385
Points:212,240
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 11:07:24 AM

Don't believe the tree huggers on this one.
Profile Pic
rjojo40
Champion Author Las Vegas

Posts:7,384
Points:1,076,615
Joined:Feb 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 11:04:27 AM

Focus on Natural gas. We have plenty of it. Lets make Natural Gas the norm.
Profile Pic
VomVom
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:3,857
Points:1,627,080
Joined:May 2007
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:29:23 AM

drpepper is right. The Canadian dilbit is no different than the dilbit imported from Veneuzla and the dilbit produced from the oil sands of East Utah. The Sierra Club continues to use false information and fearmongering tactics to advance its cause.

[Edited by: VomVom at 4/30/2012 11:29:53 AM EST]
Profile Pic
miser709
Champion Author Grand Rapids

Posts:1,268
Points:1,070,800
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 10:23:22 AM

"Because bitumen is so thick, to make it more fluid and easier to move by pipeline, it gets diluted with natural gas liquids".

Just use natural gas ONLY and remove our dependence on foreign oil. We are the Saudi Arabia of natural gas, we need to use our own resources and keep the money in the USA.

I would buy a natural gas vehicle.
Profile Pic
drpepperTX
Champion Author Texas

Posts:8,950
Points:753,185
Joined:Apr 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 9:14:16 AM

What a load of bull feces Sierra Club keeps pushing out.

They have said the oil in the pipeline is heated. WRONG. In a line like Keystone oil comes in at temps between 80-120°F. The oil stays within that temperature range during transport. The changes in temperature are the result of friction, the length of pipeline, the season and weather conditions.

The Canadian oil is very similar to oil that is already being transported and processed by other pipelines and refineries across the United States and have been for decades.

Really, it looks more and more like the opposition to the Keystone XL is more about the fear that the pipeline could actually push overall gasoline prices DOWN in the U.S.
Profile Pic
Nancy&Len
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:2,058
Points:1,946,790
Joined:Sep 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:16:15 AM

Okay
Profile Pic
Eugene_C
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:2,299
Points:155,995
Joined:Mar 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:08:51 AM

That's because most of the "clean oil" is gone and most of what is left is "dirty" oil.
Profile Pic
fracknsave
Champion Author Grand Rapids

Posts:1,666
Points:58,000
Joined:Mar 2012
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:06:23 AM

Living with your only focus on utopia does cloud reality.
Profile Pic
A2J
Champion Author Richmond

Posts:3,080
Points:603,925
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:06:10 AM

triple ???
Profile Pic
TXRanger09
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:2,511
Points:892,150
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:03:41 AM

And the Canadians haven't built a refinery near the tar sands why?!
Profile Pic
nj2000ng
Champion Author Houston

Posts:1,507
Points:449,020
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:58 AM

whatever.
Profile Pic
Buckeyee
Champion Author Maine

Posts:4,611
Points:900,600
Joined:May 2010
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:28 AM

Yes Sierra Club, ban all oil, then we can start to cut the trees in the national forest to heat our homes in winter. Another good idea, Oh Ban those wind mills too, they hurt birds too.
Profile Pic
ziyulu
Champion Author Oklahoma City

Posts:8,504
Points:1,603,850
Joined:Aug 2007
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 8:01:15 AM

Define "dirty". Dirty in that it causes pollution? Or dirty in that it is handled by unethical people?
Profile Pic
Goatroper
Champion Author Dallas

Posts:6,604
Points:1,295,435
Joined:Apr 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:54:36 AM

A little here and a little there and it adds up.
Profile Pic
manbig13
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:1,431
Points:556,725
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:53:41 AM

where is my hydrogen
Profile Pic
BurntOrange
Champion Author Austin

Posts:8,733
Points:1,583,990
Joined:Nov 2007
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:44:32 AM

I like it dirty.
Profile Pic
Joeski1
Champion Author New Jersey

Posts:10,007
Points:1,742,810
Joined:Dec 2004
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:23:02 AM

Is there clean oil?

Or is there dirty oil and dirtier oil?

Profile Pic
johntxx
Champion Author Texas

Posts:2,784
Points:617,070
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:22:19 AM

Well, the environmentalist has got the same last name. Related to Karl?

Sorry but I have to go with the common sense from the article:
"More importantly, the industry says the pipeline companies would not agree to carry this stuff if it really was destroying their systems.

"No pipeline operator would want to spend billions of dollars to transport something their pipeline can't handle," said Andy Black, president of the U.S.-based Association of Oil Pipe Lines."

Profile Pic
lcleveland
Champion Author San Antonio

Posts:2,666
Points:652,025
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:20:12 AM

ok
Profile Pic
grandmacbc
Champion Author Buffalo

Posts:6,540
Points:1,430,775
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:18:54 AM

I say these environmentalists should come up with affordable alternatives instead of just putting out their propaganda.
Profile Pic
wildddkattt80
Champion Author Phoenix

Posts:2,143
Points:432,145
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:16:08 AM

Anything to get us away from middle east oil
Profile Pic
uatide13
Rookie Author Alabama

Posts:23
Points:13,490
Joined:Apr 2012
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:15:04 AM

Good
Profile Pic
jpgilmor
Champion Author Houston

Posts:2,170
Points:604,925
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:15:03 AM

and yet environmentalists still drive……
Profile Pic
dgerst
Champion Author South Carolina

Posts:2,715
Points:557,000
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:09:45 AM

So would you want to live near a refinery that is refining this dirty oil?
Profile Pic
Evilmaddog
Champion Author British Columbia

Posts:3,327
Points:958,525
Joined:Aug 2010
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:09:43 AM

People still love throwing money to those crazy Arabs
Profile Pic
itzagasgasgas1
Champion Author Cincinnati

Posts:3,979
Points:1,600,470
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:08:30 AM

This is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about. Commonly referred to as oil sands but more accurately described as tar sands.
And what happens to the byproducts of refining?
Where does the nasty stuff go?
Profile Pic
carpenter4u
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:2,436
Points:617,145
Joined:Jul 2011
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:07:41 AM

if the oil company can notmake a profit refining "dirty oil", there would be no market for it
Profile Pic
alex395
Champion Author Louisville

Posts:2,050
Points:276,710
Joined:Jan 2007
Message Posted: Apr 30, 2012 7:07:22 AM

Don't believe anything the Sierra Club has to say. Agenda will not allow objective analysis.
Post a reply Back to Topics